原创《戴名世和清前期文化政策》：本文是一篇关于戴名世论文范文，可作为相关选题参考,和写作参考文献。
[摘 要]戴名世因《南山集》案彰显悲情的一生.其实,探究戴名世的字号、文章及交游发现：此案发生的必然性在于,戴氏作为士人的一个代表存在着对朝廷的认同问题,而这在清统治者看来是不可容忍的.康熙帝处理此案采取了高压与怀柔并用的手段,这并不违背“稽古右文”以集大成的文化政策.历经此案劫后,清代士人群体特别是桐城籍士人,及时调整了与当朝的关系,消解夷夏之别的文化隔阂,彰显古文经世致用的现实功能,不仅使大部分士人割断了与前朝的联系,而且也促使桐城派的产生,进而“北方之强”与“南方之强”在有清一代中奏出具有总结和整理特色的文化强音.戴名世作为使桐城籍士人以古文与当朝建立的关系转折性的人物,显然,研究桐城派不可绕过戴名世,更不能忽视清前期的文化政策.
[关键词]戴名世；清前期；《南山集》案；经世致用；桐城派
[中图分类号]K249[文献标志码]A[文章编号]1000-3541（2015）03-0088-06
Dai Ming Shi and cultural policy of early qing dynasty
SHENG Xian-feng
（Department and History,Anhui University,Hefei 230039,China）
Abstract： Because of the Case‘The volume of Nanshan’,Dai ming-shi lifetime was full of the pathetic.In fact, exploring his font, articles, and friends：As a representative of scholars, The necessity of the case is because of the identity question between the court and himself ,and the phenomenon which qing dynast could’t acceptable.To deal with the Case,Emperor Kangxi took the methods of control and molification, the methods can’t violation the whole cultural policy of ‘JI GU YOU WEN’ . After this case ended, the scholars of qing dynast, especially for the the place of TongCheng origin, Adjust to the relationships with the reign in time, dispelling the cultural gulf differents outlooks on YI-XIA, and the scholars demostrated the real functions of the ancient Chinese prose about the emphasizing statecraft,It not only help the majority of the scholars cut of the relations with previous dynasty, but also encourged the school of Tongcheng established, and then in Qing dynasty ‘the powerful of the north and the south’ have collisioned to expressed the cultural characteristics of summarized and arranged. Dai ming-shi, the watershelds person in place of TongCheng origin which used ancient Chinese prose to make a relationships with the reign. Obviously, As we studying the TongCheng school,we can’t bypassing the person called‘Dai Ming Shi’,more cannot igore the cultural policy in earlier Qing dynasty.
Key words：Dai Ming Shi；early qing dynasty； the Case‘The volume of Nanshan’；Emphasizing statecraft；Tongcheng school
[收稿日期]2015-02-06
[基金项目]本文为横向项目“国学对于现代国民性建构的功能研究”（2013SKH010033）成果之一
戴名世以悲情的人生结局,使其身后清朝大部分士人彻底割断了与前朝的魂牵梦绕.此后,力主宋学、主张文章经世的桐城派日渐崛起,雄踞有清一代文坛,有“天下文章,其出于桐城乎”[1]（卷八,《刘海峰先生八十寿序》）的美誉,影响时间长达二百余年,萃聚作家多达一千二百余人,其汇集学者人数之多、流衍波及地域之广、产生影响程度之大,为清代文坛所独具,也为中国文学史上所罕见.学界言桐城派者必言“三祖”——盖方苞、刘大櫆、姚鼐之文章、之古文法有所法、所变,谈派不能不谈三祖.但三祖的文章经世是在士人与清廷的政治关系转变的过程中发生的,而对这一关系产生影响之一的《南山集》案的核心人物——戴名世,似不能置身于桐城派之外?
戴名世论文参考资料：
结论：戴名世和清前期文化政策为适合戴名世论文写作的大学硕士及相关本科毕业论文，相关戴名世故里开题报告范文和学术职称论文参考文献下载。
