原创《会阴无保护分娩技术临床应用效果分析》：本文关于会阴论文范文,可以做为相关论文参考文献,与写作提纲思路参考。
【摘 要】 目的 探究會阴无保护分娩技术的临床应用效果.方法 120例无妊娠期并发症且自然分娩的足月单胎头位初产妇作为观察对象, 随机分为观察组和对照组, 每组60例.对照组初产妇选择传统分娩技术, 观察组初产妇选择会阴无保护分娩技术, 对比两组初产妇的产妇满意度、产程疼痛程度、会阴侧切情况、伤口感染情况、会阴裂伤程度、新生儿情况及产后2 h出血量、第二产程时间.
结果 观察组初产妇满意度为95.00%, 明显高于对照组的83.33%, 差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）.观察组初产妇产程疼痛程度明显低于对照组, 差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）.观察组初产妇会阴侧切率为8.33%, 明显低于对照组的48.33%, 差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）.观察组初产妇会阴裂伤程度明显轻于对照组, 差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）.观察组初产妇伤口感染率略低于对照组, 但差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）.两组新生儿体质量、窒息率、Apgar评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）.对照组产后2 h
出血量为（225.73±62.80）ml, 明显多于观察组的（194.64±43.55）ml, 差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）.对照组第二产程时间为（39.54±10.38）min, 与观察组的（40.18±11.26）min比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）.
结论 通过会阴无保护分娩技术进行干预, 可将无妊娠期并发症且自然分娩的足月单胎头位初产妇的产程疼痛程度降低, 减少产妇会阴损伤, 不会增加产后2 h出血量以及产妇第二产程时间, 提高了产科质量, 保障母婴安全, 具有临床应用价值.
【关键词】 无保护分娩；产程疼痛；会阴裂伤
DOI：10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.30.013
Analysis on clinical application effect of perineum unprotected delivery technique DENG Xiao-hua, SHAO Peng-fei, FAN Xiu-juan, et al. Liaohe Oil Field General Hospital, Panjin 124010, China
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the clinical application effect of perineum unprotected delivery technique. Methods A total of 120 full-term primipara with no gestational complications and spontaneous delivery as observation subjects were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group received traditional delivery technique, and the observation group received perineum unprotected delivery technique. Comparison were made on satisfaction degree, labor pain, episiotomy situation, wound infection, perineal laceration degree, neonatal situation and 2 h postpartum hemorrhage volume, second stage of labor time between two groups. Results The observation group had obviously higher satisfaction degree as 95.00% than 83.33% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. The observation group had obviously lower labor pain than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. The observation group had obviously lower episiotomy rate as 8.33% than 48.33% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. The observation group had obviously lighter perineal laceration degree than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. The observation group had a little lower wound infection rate than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant （P>0.05）. Both groups had no statistically significant difference in neonatal body mass, asphyxia rate, Apgar score （P>0.05）. The control group had obviously more 2 h postpartum hemorrhage volume as （225.73±62.80） ml than （194.64±43.55） ml in the observation group, and the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. The control group had no statistically significant difference in second stage of labor time as （39.54±10.38） min, comparing with （40.18±11.26） min in the observation group （P>0.05）.
会阴论文参考资料：
结论：会阴无保护分娩技术临床应用效果分析为关于会阴方面的论文题目、论文提纲、男性睾丸和肛门中间疼论文开题报告、文献综述、参考文献的相关大学硕士和本科毕业论文。
