原创《疼痛护理干预对疼痛患者预后影响分析》：本论文可用于预后论文范文参考下载，预后相关论文写作参考研究。
[摘 要] 目的 探討疼痛护理干预应用于疼痛科护理工作中的效果及对预后的影响,为临床护理提供参考依据. 方法方便选取该院2015年1月—2017年1月所收治疼痛科患者106例,随机分成研究组和对照组.对照组53例,予以疼痛科常规护理；研究组53例,加用疼痛护理干预.比较两组患者护理干预前后疼痛程度评分、焦虑程度评分（SAS）；比较两组出院时护理满意度情况；并随访6个月,记录两组患者生活质量评分.结果 干预前,两组疼痛评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；干预后,研究组疼痛评分为（3.25±1.44）分,显著低于对照组的（6.41±2.79）分,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）.干预前,两组SAS评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；干预后,研究组SAS评分为（24.35±7.14）分,显著低于对照组的（30.22±8.81）分,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）.研究组加用疼痛护理干预后,非常满意32例、一般满意19例,护理满意度为96.23%,显著优于对照组的22例、20例及79.25%,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）.随访6个月,研究组生活质量优良率为90.57%,显著优于对照组的69.81%,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）. 结论 疼痛护理干预应用于疼痛科患者临床护理工作中,可有效减轻患者疼痛程度、降低焦虑程度,拉近护患关系,提升护理满意度,并且有利于生活质量及预后质量提升,值得临床推广应用.
[关键词] 疼痛护理；疼痛科；预后
[中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2017）11（b）-0138-03
[Abstract] Objective This paper tries to investigate the effect of pain care intervention on the nursing of pain department and its influence on prognosis, so as to provide reference for clinical nursing. Methods 106 cases of pain patients in this hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were convenient selected and randomly divided into the study group and the control group. The control group （53 cases） received routine care. The study group （53 cases） received pain nursing intervention. The pain scores and anxiety scores （SAS） were compared between the two groups before and after the nursing intervention. The satiaction degree of the two groups was compared between the two groups. The patients were followed up for 6 months, and the quality of life scores of the two groups were recorded. Results Before the intervention, the two groups had no significant difference in pain scores（P>0.05）； after the intervention, pain score of study group was （3.25±1.44）points, significantly lower than the control group of （6.41±2.79）points, with significant difference（P<0.05）. Before the intervention, the SAS scores of the two groups had no significant difference（P>0.05）； after the intervention, the SAS scores of the study group was（24.35±7.14） points, significantly lower than the control group of （30.22±8.81）points, with significant difference（P<0.05）. In the study group with pain care intervention, 32 cases were very satisfied, 19 cases of general satisfaction, nursing satisfaction rate was 96.23%, significantly better than the control group of 22 cases, 20 cases and 79.25%, with significant difference（P<0.05）. After a follow-up of 6 months, the quality of life in the study group was 90.57%, significantly higher than that in the control group of 69.81%, and the difference was significant（P<0.05）. Conclusion Pain nursing intervention used for clinical nursing of patients with pain can effectively relieve the pain and reduce the degree of anxiety, build closer relationship between nurses and patients, improve nursing satisfaction, and are conducive to the quality of life and enhance the quality of prognosis, so it is worthy of clinical application.
预后论文参考资料：
结论：疼痛护理干预对疼痛患者预后影响分析为关于预后方面的论文题目、论文提纲、预后论文开题报告、文献综述、参考文献的相关大学硕士和本科毕业论文。
